Professional Ethical Priorities in Auditing using the Delphi Fuzzy Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

2 Department of Accounting, East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The bankruptcy of international firms is due to accounting fraud ignorance that finally arises from the decline of morality and forgetting the auditing mission as a self-governing profession. The basis of most auditing performances should be assessed in the behaviours and values of auditors, so professional behaviour and its consequences are among the main research topics in organisational areas. This paper aims to explain the priorities of professional ethics in auditing using the Fuzzy Delphi Approach. In this paper, the Fuzzy Delphi Technique is applied as one of the scientific analysis techniques to reach a consensus among panel members (scholars) for determining the dimensions and indicators of professional behaviour code. To collect the research data, a 25-item questionnaire is designed using the previous studies' results. An interview is sent for the panel members, including scholars and specialists with PhD in accounting and 5 years of work experience with research records. The obtained results are analysed using the Fuzzy Delphi Technique. Five aspects and their subsequent indicators are detected under environmental, organisational, social, ethical values, and personality trait components. These subsections can direct the managers and planners to develop professional ethics.

Keywords

Main Subjects


©2022 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

1. Ahmadi, M. R., Ahangari, A., and Salehinia, M. (2020). Effective Structures modeling on professional ethics of auditing by using interpretive structural modeling from the perspective of profession experts. Journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting, 4(8), pp. 281-317 (In Persian)
2. Amiri, A. N., Hemmati, M. and Mobini, M. (2011). Professional ethics: A necessity for the organisation. Journal of Moral Ethical, 1(4), pp. 137-159 (In Persian).
3. Birjandi, H., Khodamipour, A. and Pourheidari, O. (2019). Investigating the Impact of Professional ethics on Auditor's Professional skepticism. Management Accounting, 12(42), pp. 15-26 (In Persian).
4. Elias, R. Z. (2016). The effect of corporate ethical values on accountants’ perceptions of social responsibility. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 21(4), pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v21i4.1453
5. Enwereuzor, I. K., Onyishi, I. E., Albi-Oparaocha, F. C. and Amaeshi, K. (2020). Perceived leader integrity as a mediator between ethical leadership and ethical climate in a teaching context. BMC psychology, 8(1), pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00420-6
6. Haeridistia, N. and Fadjarenie, A. (2019). The effect of independence, professional ethics & auditor experience on audit quality. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(2), pp. 1-12.
7. Hajering, M. S. (2019). Moderating Ethics Auditors Influence of Competence, Accountability on Audit Quality. Jurnal Akuntansi, 23(3), pp. 468-481. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v23i3.614
8. Kholina, O., Petrova, E. and Buyndyugova, T. (2019). Formation of professional behavior as a technology of social and labour rehabilitation of persons with special educational needs. In SHS Web of Conferences, 72(7), pp. 04010). https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197204010
9. Kiradoo, G. (2020). Ethics in Accounting: Analysis of Current Financial Failures and Role of Accountants. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(2), pp. 241-247.
10. Miller, G. (2018). Aiming Professional Ethics Courses Toward Identity Development. In Ethics Across the Curriculum—Pedagogical Perspectives, Springer, Cham. New York City
11. Oboh, C. S. (2019). Personal and moral intensity determinants of ethical decision-making: a study of accounting professionals in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. 9(1), pp. 148-180. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-04-2018-0035
12. Oraka, A. O. and Okegbe, T. O. (2015). The impact of professional accounting ethics in quality assurance in audit. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(8), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v5-i8/1761
13. Royaei, R., Molaie Nezhad, M. and Karimi, S. (2019). Analysis of Compliance with Rules of Professional Conduct by Auditors Employed in Audit Firms. Accounting and Auditing Studies, 8(32), pp. 45-58 (In Persian).
14. Saghafi, A., Rahmani, A. and Rafiei, A. (2011). Teaching accounting ethics in the undergraduate course, The Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 5(1-2), 7-18 (In Persian).
15. Saiedi, M. and Naseri, A. (2017). Auditor’s personal characteristics and professional judgment. financial Accounting and Auditing Researches. 9(36), 111-130 (In Persian).
16. Salajeghe, A. and Safari, S. (2016). Relationship between Professional Ethics and Function of Professors. Ethics in science and Technology. The Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 10(3), 103-110 (In Persian).
17. Shafer, W. E. and Simmons, R. S. (2008). Social responsibility, Machiavellianism and tax avoidance: A study of Hong Kong tax professionals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 21(5), pp. 695-720. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810872978
18. Tzabbar, D., Tzafrir, S. and Baruch, Y. (2017). A bridge over troubled water: Replication, integration and extension of the relationship between HRM practices and organisational performance using moderating meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), pp.134-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.002).
19. Verschoor, C. C. (2005). Do the right thing: IMA issues new ethics guidance. Strategic finance, pp. 42-47.
20. Zarefar, A. and Zarefar, A. (2016). The Influence of Ethics, experience and competency toward the quality of auditing with professional auditor scepticism as a Moderating Variable. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219(114), pp. 828-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.074
CAPTCHA Image