Banker, R. Byzalov, D. and Plehn-Dujowich, J. (2011). Sticky Cost Behavior: Theory and Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal,
http://astro.temple.edu DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1659493
Barth, M., Beaver, W. and landsman, W. (2001).The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. journal of accounting and economics, 31, 77-104.
Bauwhede, H.V. and Willekens, M. (2004). Evidence on (the lack of) Audit – quality. Differentiation in the Private Client Segment of the Belgian Audit Market.
European Accounting Review, 13(3), 501 – 522.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000237106
Becker, C.L. DeFond, M.L. Jiambalvo, J. and Subramanyam, K.R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15, 1-24.
Catanach, A. and Walker, P. (1999). The international debate over mandatory auditor rotation: A conceptual research framework.
Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 8(1), 43-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(99)00004-X
Chuntao, L. Song, F.M. and Wong, S.M.L. (2007). Audit Firm Size and Perception of Audit Quality: Evidences from a competitive Audit market in china. 1-17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252154124_Audit_Firm_Size_Effects_in_China's_Emerging_Audit_Market
DeAngelo, L.E. (1981). Auditor Independence, Low Balling, and Disclosures Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113-127.
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90009-4
DeAngelo, L.E. (1986). “Accounting Number as Market Valuation Substitutes: A Study of Management Buyouts of Public Stockholder”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 400-420. http://www.jstor.org/stable/247149
Deltas, G. and Doogar, R. (2004). Product and Cost Differentiation by Large Audit Firms. 1 -10. http://faculty.las.illinois.edu/deltas/UnpublishedWorkingPapers/AuditorDifferentiation.pdf
Dies, D.R. and Giroux, G.A. (1992). Determinants of Audit Quality in the Public Sector. The Accounting Review, 67(3), 462-479. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247972
Financial Reporting Council. (2008). The Audit Quality Framework. Available at
SSRN: http://www.frc.org.uk/ documents/pagemanager/frc/promoting_audit_quality_responses/audit%20quality%20framework%20f r%20 web.pdf
Fuerman, R. (2006). Comparing the Auditor Quality of Arthur Andersen to that of the Big 4. API, 6,1-10.
Ghylin, K.M. Green, B.D. Drury, C.G. Chen, J. Schultz, J.L. Uggirala, A. Abraham, J.K. and Lawson, T.A. (2008). Clarifying the dimensions of four concepts of quality.
Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(1), 73-94.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220600857639
Hamilton, J. Ruddock, C. Stokes, D. and Taylor, S. (2005) . Audit partner rotation, earnings quality and earnings conservatism.
SSRN Electronic Journal, Doi:
10.2139/ssrn.740846
Henock, L. (2005). Acquirers Abnormal Returns Audit Firm Size and the Small Auditor Clientele Effect. Journal of accounting and economics, 53 – 55.
Krishnan, J. and Scheuer, P.C. (2000). The Differentiation of Quality Among Auditors: Evidence from the Not – for – Profit Sector Auditing. A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(2), 9-26.
Kwon, S.Y. Lim, C.Y. and Tan, P. (2007). Legal systems and earnings quality: the role of auditor industry specialization. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 26(2), 25-55.
https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2007.26.2.25
Lam, S. and Chang, S. (1994). Auditor Service Quality and Auditor Size: Evidence from Initial Public Offerings in Singapore.
Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 3(1), 103-114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/1061-9518(94)90009-4
Lawrence, A. and Zhang, P. (2011). Can Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 - differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics?. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 259-286. DOI: 10.2308/accr.00000009
Watkins, A.L. Hillison, W. and Morecroft, S.E. (2004). Audit Quality: A Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence.
Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 153–193.
http://www.sciepub.com/reference/69713
Send comment about this article