Religion, Cultural Elements and the Stock Price Crash Risk: a Test of Alternative and Complementary Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Abbas Ghodrati Zoeram ¹
• Mojtaba Alifamian ²
• Soheyla Teymoorpoor ³

¹ Department of Accounting, Faculty of Humanities, Technical and Vocational University, Shirvan, Iran

² PHD Student in Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

³ Department of Accounting, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran

10.22067/ijaaf.2022.41611

Abstract

As one of the most critical issues widely discussed in financial studies, the stock price crash is affected by different factors. Despite the importance of this issue for shareholders and investors, the behavioral characteristics of managers responsible for preparing financial statements have not been considered recently. Among those characteristics, the religion and culture of management have been mentioned in this research. Accordingly, the study examines the effect of managers' religion (replacement or complementary effect) and culture on the stock price crash risk in companies listed consistently on the stock exchange until the end of 2019. Therefore, in order to measure the stock price crash risk, two criteria consisting of negative skewness of stock return and down-to-up volatility have been applied. Hofstede's (2001) questionnaire was used to measure culture, and Li and Cai (2016) model was used to measure religion. Then, the results were analyzed by using multivariate regression models. Findings indicate that among the dimensions of culture, the uncertainty avoidance dimension has a negative effect. The dimension of individualism positively affects the stock price crash risk. The dimensions, including power distance and masculinity, do not affect the stock price crash risk. The negative impact of uncertainty avoidance means that conservative risk-averse managers do not make decisions in uncertain conditions. Because they are less inclined to accumulate bad news, they might reduce the stock price crash risk. On the other hand, the positive effect of individualism on the stock price crash risk shows that individualistic managers who do not consult with others about their decisions and insist on their wrong decisions ignore the negative consequences of harmful investments with excessive trust in their decisions and lead to the accumulation of losses in the company and consequently increasing stock price crash risk.   The results also show religion's negative and significant effect on the stock price crash risk. Religion reduces the risk of falling stock prices by reducing opportunism and agency problems. In addition, according to the complementarity theory, the sensitivity analysis results show that corporate governance exacerbates the negative relationship between religion and stock price crash risk of companies.

Keywords

• Alternative and Complementary Theory
• Culture
• Religion
• Stock Price Risk

Main Subjects

• Accounting

---

©2022 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

References

1. Ahmed, A. S. and Duellman, S. (2013). Managerial overconfidence and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), pp. 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00467.x
2. Allen, J. L. and Fang, X. (2015). Religion and stock price crash risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(1-2), pp. 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109015000046
3. Bradshaw, M. T., Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J. and Tehranian, H. (2010). Opacity, Crashes and the option Smirk Curve. Working paper, Boston College, United States. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1640733
4. Callen, J. L. and Fang, X. (2013). Institutional investor stability and crash risk: Monitoring versus short-termism?Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), pp. 3047-3063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.02.018
5. Cao, C., Xia, C. and Chan, K. C. (2016). Social trust and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 46(11), pp. 148-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.09.003
6. Chen, D., Hu, X., Liang, S. and Xin, F. (2013). Religious tradition and corporate governance. Economic Research Journal, 59(10), pp. 71–84.
7. Chen, J., Hong, H. and Stein, J. C. (2001). Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), pp. 345-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00066-6
8. Chen, Y., P.Y. Dou, S.G. Rhee, C. Truong, and M. Veeraraghavan. (2015). National culture and corporate cash holdings around the world. Journal of Banking and Finance, 50(1), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.09.018
9. Chui, A.C., Titman, S. and Wei. K.J. (2010). Individualism and momentum around the world. Journal of Finance, 65(1), pp. 361-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01532.x
10. Dang, T.L., Faff, R., Luong, L.H. and Nguyen. L. (2017). National Culture and Stock Price Crash Risk, European Financial Management, Working paper, Australia, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2711204
11. Du, X. (2013). Does religion matter to owner–manager agency costs? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 118 (2), pp. 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1569-y
12. Du, X., Jian, W., Du, Y., Feng, W. and Zeng, Q. (2014). Religion, the nature of ultimate owner, and corporate philanthropic giving: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), pp. 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1804-1
13. Du, X., Jian, W., Lai, S., Du, Y. and Pei, H. (2015). Does religion mitigate earnings management? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), pp. 699-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2290-9
14. Dyreng, S. D., Mayew, W. J. and Williams, C. D. (2012). Religious social norms and corporate financial reporting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39(7‐8), pp. 845-875.
15. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Ni, Y., Pittman, J. and Saadi, S. (2012). Does religion matter to equity pricing?. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), pp. 491-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1213-x
16. ElMassah, S. and Abou-El-Sood, H. (2021), Selection of Islamic banking in a multicultural context: the role of gender and religion, Journal of Islamic Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2020-0160
17. Ferris, S. P., Jayaraman, N. and Sabherwal, S. (2013). CEO overconfidence and international merger and acquisition activity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(1), pp. 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109013000069
18. Gray, S.J. 1988. Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus. Vol. 24: 1-15.
19. Grullon, G., Kanatas, G. and Weston, J. (2009). Religion and corporate (mis) behavior. Rice University, United States. https://ssrn.com/ abstract = 1472118
20. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Hong, H. and Stein, J. C. (2003). Differences of opinion, short-sales constraints, and market crashes. The Review of Financial Studies, 16(2), pp. 487-525. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg006
22. Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J. and Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), pp. 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.003
23. Javers, E. (2011). Religion, Not Money, Often Motivates Corporate Whistleblowers. New Jersey, United States. http:// www.cnbc.com/id/ 41494697
24. Khan, M. and Watts, R. L. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), pp. 132-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.002
25. Kim, J. B., Li, Y. and Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), pp. 639-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.07.007
26. Li, W. and Cai, G. (2016). Religion and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(3), pp. 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2016.04.003
27. Li, X., Wang, S. S. and Wang, X. (2017). Trust and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 76(6), pp. 74-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.12.003
28. Malmendier, U., Tate, G. and Yan, J. (2011). Overconfidence and early‐life experiences: the effect of managerial traits on corporate financial policies. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), pp. 1687-1733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01685.x
29. Montenegro, T. M. (2017). Religiosity and corporate financial reporting: evidence from a European country. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 14(1), pp. 48-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2016.1249395
30. North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Working paper, Cambridge University. United Kingdom
31. Wei, S., 2002. Economics and Ethics: Exploring the Ethical Dimensions of Market Economy and the Moral Foundation. Shanghai People’s Press, Shanghai (in Chinese).
32. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), pp. 595-613.
33. Xu, N., Jiang, X., Chan, K. C. and Yi, Z. (2013). Analyst coverage, optimism, and stock price crash risk: evidence from China. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 25(11), pp. 217–239.