Auditor Management by the Client using the Omissions and Auditor’s Assessment of the Misstatements Detection: Bait for the Auditor Management

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Fatemeh Zholanezhad
• Ehsan Kamali
• Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani

Department of Accounting, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

10.22067/ijaaf.2022.42123

Abstract

One of the strategies of audited firms' management is to divert the auditor's attention from the managed accounts to clean accounts (without misstatement) or accounts that contain misstatements other than managed accounts to affect the auditor's ability to detect fraud. The experimental method and a sample include 106 auditors in 2022. We examine whether managers attempt to reduce the perceived intentionality of their fraudulent misstatements by perpetrating fraud via omission, as opposed to a more active form of commission, and how auditors evaluate the resulting misstatements. We find that managers choose to omit a transaction from the financial statements rather than record a transaction inappropriately. They also decide to omit critical information from supporting documents rather than provide misleading information. However, auditors generally believe that misstatements involving omissions are unintentional. Specifically, we find that auditors are less skeptical of an omitted transaction than a misrecorded transaction. They are also less skeptical of a misstatement that results from management omitting information from a supporting document than misrepresenting information. Finally, a method of fraud (omission) is identified that those managers are likely to use; on the other hand, those auditors are unlikely to judge it as intentional.

Keywords

• Auditor Management
• Clean Accounts
• Fraud Detection
• Misrecorded Transaction Strategy
• Omission Strategy
• Omissions Bias

Main Subjects

• Auditing

---

©2022 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

References

1. Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), pp. 139-167.
2. Baron, J. and Ritov, I. (2004). Omission bias, individual differences, and normality. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 94(2), pp. 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.03.003
3. Baron, R. S., Baron, P. H. and Miller, N. (1973). The relation between distraction and persuasion. Psychological Bulletin, 80(4), pp. 310-323. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0034950
4. Beasley, M. S., J. V. Carcello, D. R. Hermanson, and T. L. Neal. (2010). Fraudulent financial reporting 1998 – 2007, an analysis of U.S. public companies. Association Sections, Divisions, Boards, Teams.Working paper. New York
5. Behzadian, F., Izadi Nia, N. (2018). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Audit Quality from the Viewpoints of Independent Auditors and Financial Managers of Companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Accounting Advances, 10(1), pp. 30-63. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22099/JAA.2018.25885.1578
6. Bowlin, K. (2011). Risk-based auditing, strategic prompts, and auditor sensitivity to the strategic risk of fraud. The Accounting Review, 86(4), 1231-1253.
7. Caramanis, C. and Lennox, C. (2008). Audit effort and earnings management. Journal of accounting and economics, 45(1), pp. 116-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.05.002
8. Carpenter, T. D. (2007). Audit team brainstorming, fraud risk identification, and fraud risk assessment: Implications of SAS No. 99. The Accounting Review, 82(5), pp. 1119-1140. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1119
9. Cushman, F., Young, L. and Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological science, 17(12), pp. 1082-1089. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9280.2006.01834.x
10. Daryaei, A. and Kholousi Moshfegh, L. (2020). Impact of Self-Control Ego Depletion on Quality of Judgment and Decision-Making of Auditors (Test of Self-Control Ego Depletion Theory). Journal of Health Accounting, 8(2), pp. 20-38. (In Persian). https://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jha.2020.68195.1227
11. Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R. and Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary accounting research, 28(1), pp. 17-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x
12. Dechow, P. M., Hutton, A. P., Kim, J. H. and Sloan, R. G. (2012). Detecting earnings management: A new approach. Journal of accounting research, 50(2), pp. 275-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00449.x
13. DeScioli, P., Bruening, R. and Kurzban, R. (2011b). The omission effect in moral cognition: Toward a functional explanation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(3), pp. 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.01.003
14. DeScioli, P., Christner, J. and Kurzban, R. (2011a). The omission strategy. Psychological science, 22(4), pp. 442-446. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797611400616
15. Forsyth, D. R. and O’Boyle, E. H., Jr. (2013). Ethics position theory and unethical work behavior, Handbook of unethical work behavior: Implications for individual well-being, pp. 221–236. Armonk, NY
16. Freudenburg, W. R. and Alario, M. (2007). Weapons of mass distraction: Magicianship, misdirection, and the dark side of legitimation. Sociological Forum, 22(2), pp.146-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2007.00011.x
17. Hamilton, E. L. and Smith, J. L. (2021). Error or fraud? The effect of omissions on management's fraud strategies and auditors' evaluations of identified misstatements. The Accounting Review, 96(1), pp. 225-249. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0355
18. Hammersley, J. S. (2011). A review and model of auditor judgments in fraud-related planning tasks. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(4), pp. 101-128. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10145
19. Hoffman, V. B. and Zimbelman, M. F. (2009). Do strategic reasoning and brainstorming help auditors change their standard audit procedures in response to fraud risk?. The Accounting Review, 84(3), pp. 811-837. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.811
20. Hoffman, V. B., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). How strategic reasoning and brainstorming can help auditors detect fraud. Current Issues in Auditing, 6(2), P25-P33.
21. Jamal, K., Johnson, P. E. and Berryman, R. G. (1995). Detecting framing effects in financial statements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 12(1), pp. 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00482.x
22. Khoshtinat, M., Bostanian, J. (2007). Professional Judgment in Auditing. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 5(18), pp. 25-57. (In pesian)
23. Kordes-de Vaal, J. H. (1996). Intention and the omission bias: Omissions perceived as nondecisions. Acta Psychologica, 93(1-3), pp. 161-172.
24. Luippold, B. L., Kida, T., Piercey, M. D. and Smith, J. F. (2015). Managing audits to manage earnings: The impact of diversions on an auditor’s detection of earnings management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 41(4), pp. 39-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.07.005
25. Mashlah, S. A. M. E. R. (2015). The role of people’s personal values in the workplace. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 1(9), pp. 158-164.
26. Miller, W. R., Zweben, J. and Johnson, W. R. (2005). Evidence-based treatment: why, what, where, when, and how?. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 29(4), pp. 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2005.08.003
27. Moradi, J., Rostami, R., and Zare, R. (2014). Recognizing Risk Factors Affecting Fraud Probability in Financial Reporting from Auditors' Viewpoint and Its Impact on Firms' Performance. Journal of Accounting Advances, 6(1), pp. 141-173 (In Persian). https://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jaa.2014.2261
28. Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion, pp. 1-24. Springer, New York, NY.
29. Pratoomsuwan, T. and Yolrabil, O. (2020). Fraud and Error Misstatements and Auditor Liability: The Moderating Role of the Evaluator’s Auditing Knowledge. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 30(1), pp. 42-55.
30. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2002a). Responsibilities and Functions of the Independent Auditor. PCAOB Interim Auditing Standard 1001. Washington DC: PCAOB.
31. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2002b). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. PCAOB Interim Auditing Standard 2401. Washington DC: PCAOB.
32. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2010). Evaluating Audit Results. Auditing Standard 2810. Washington DC: PCAOB.
33. Rahmawati, H. S. and Indrijawati, A. (2020). Auditor Experience, Work Load, Personality Type, And Professional Auditor Skeptisism Against Auditors' Ability In Detecting Fraud. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(2), pp. 1878-1890.
34. Ritov, I. and Baron, J. (1999). Protected values and omission bias. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 79(2), pp. 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2839
35. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press. N.Y
36. Sandhu, N. (2022), Red flag behaviors in financial services frauds: a mixed-methods study, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 30(2), pp. 167-195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-01-2021-0005
37. Schwartz, S. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative sociology, 5(2-3), pp. 137-182. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357
38. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(2), pp.1-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
39. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. Journal of social issues, 50(4), pp. 19-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
40. Spranca, M., Minsk, E. and Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of experimental social psychology, 27(1), pp. 76-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-T
41. Street, M. D., Douglas, S. C., Geiger, S. W. and Martinko, M. J. (2001). The impact of cognitive expenditure on the ethical decision-making process: The cognitive elaboration model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), pp. 256-277. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2957
42. Verwey, I. G. and Asare, S. K. (2022). The joint effect of ethical idealism and trait skepticism on auditors’ fraud detection. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(2), pp. 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04718-8
43. Widodo, N. H. and Chariri, A. (2021). The Relationship Between Audit Procedures, Auditors’Experience and Auditors’Responsibility for Fraud Detection. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 10(1), pp. 1-10
44. Wilks, T. J., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2004). Decomposition of fraud‐risk assessments and auditors' sensitivity to fraud cues. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(3), 719-745.
45. Zimbelman, M. F., & Waller, W. S. (1999). An experimental investigation of auditor-auditee interaction under ambiguity. Journal of Accounting Research, 37, 135-155.