Guilt Aversion and the Financial Behavior of Individuals: The Moderating Role of Ethical Ideologies

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Mahsa Esmaeili
• Alireza Fazlzadeh
• Vahid Ahmadian
• Sajad Nagdi

Department of Economics, Management and Accounting, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

10.22067/ijaaf.2024.45035.1435

Abstract

In the rapidly advancing economic and technological landscape, the importance of ethical considerations in individual decision-making has gained unprecedented attention. The absolute authority held by one party in certain business contexts, such as participatory budgeting and financial consulting, emphasizes the significance of ethical decision-making. This research aims to investigate how individuals’ guilt aversion influences their financial behavior while also considering the moderating role of their ethical ideologies. This approach addresses the research gap regarding the oversight of individuals’ personal attitudes toward ethics when studying guilt aversion. The study population was comprised of undergraduate students at the University of Tabriz, and a sample of 52 participants was selected using a random sampling method. The sample was then divided into two groups, dictators and receivers, and their behavior was examined. A combination of active observation and questionnaire methods was employed to collect data. The results suggest that while guilt aversion does not significantly impact individuals’ financial behavior, ethical ideologies moderate the relationship between guilt aversion and financial behavior.

Keywords

• Experimental Economics
• Ethical Ideologies Financial Behavior
• Guilt Aversion
• Social Effects

Main Subjects

• Finance

---

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

References

1. Allmon, D. E., Page, D. and Rpberts, R. (2000). Determinants of perceptions of cheating: Ethical orientation, personality and demographics. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(4), pp. 411-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006087104087
2. Angelova, V. and Regner, T. (2013). Do voluntary payments to advisors improve the quality of financial advice? An experimental deception game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, pp. 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.022
3. Attanasi, G., Rimbaud, C. and Villeval, M. C. (2019). Embezzlement and guilt aversion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 167, pp. 409-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.02.002
4. Balafoutas, L. and Sutter, M. (2017). On the nature of guilt aversion: Insights from a new methodology in the dictator game. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 13, pp. 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2016.12.001
5. Barnett, T., Bass, K. and Brown, G. (1994). Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(6), pp. 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881456
6. Beck, A., Kerschbamer, R., Qiu, J. and Sutter, M. (2013). Shaping beliefs in experimental markets for expert services: Guilt aversion and the impact of promises and money-burning options. Games and Economic Behavior, 81, pp. 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.05.002
7. Bellemare, C., Sebald, A. and Suetens, S. (2018). Heterogeneous guilt sensitivities and incentive effects. Experimental Economics, 21(2), pp. 316-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9543-2
8. Brosig, J., Weimann, J. and Ockenfels, A. (2003). The effect of communication media on cooperation. German Economic Review, 4(2), pp. 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0475.00080
9. Brown, J. L., Evans III, J. H. and Moser, D. V. (2009). Agency theory and participative budgeting experiments. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 21(1), pp. 317-345. 10.2308/jmar.2009.21.1.317
10. Cartwright, E. (2018). Behavioral economics. Routledge. (3rd ed.). London, U.K.
11. Cartwright, E., Chai, Y. and Xue, L. (2023). Are My Team Members Pro-Social? Information About Social Value Orientation Influences Cooperation in Public Good Games. Information About Social Value Orientation Influences Cooperation in Public Good Games. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4628488
12. Cason, T. N. and Mui, V. L. (1998). Social influence in the sequential dictator game. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42(2-3), pp. 248-265. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022249698912135
13. Charness, G. and Dufwenberg, M. (2006). Promises and partnership. Econometrica, 74(6), pp. 1579-1601. http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00719.x
14. Charness, G. and Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), pp. 817-869. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302760193904
15. Dufwenberg, M. (2008). Psychological games. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 6, pp. 714-717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2116-1
16. Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Tjøtta, S. and Torsvik, G. (2010). Testing guilt aversion. Games and Economic Behavior, 68(1), pp. 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2009.04.021
17. Fehr, E. and Charness, G. (2023). Social preferences: fundamental characteristics and economic consequences. Available at SSRN 4464745. University of California, Santa Barbara. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4464745
18. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 39(1), pp. 175. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.175
19. Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), pp. 218-223. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/014616728172006
20. Forsyth, D. R. and Berger, R. E. (1982). The effects of ethical ideology on moral behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117(1), pp. 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9713406
21. Güth, W., Ploner, M. and Regner, T. (2009). Determinants of in-group bias: Is group affiliation mediated by guilt-aversion?. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), pp. 814-827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.07.001
22. Kawagoe, T. and Narita, Y. (2014). Guilt aversion revisited: An experimental test of a new model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 102, pp. 1-9. 10.2139/ssrn.1704884
23. Khalmetski, K. (2016). Testing guilt aversion with an exogenous shift in beliefs. Games and Economic Behavior, 97, pp. 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.04.003
24. Rasmußen, A. (2015). Reporting behavior: a literature review of experimental studies. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 23(2), pp. 283-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-014-0379-y
25. Stevens, S. P. (2008). Games people play: Game theory in life, business, and beyond. Great course.