Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance

Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance

Board Characteristics, Audit Fees, and Political Connections: An Integration of Resource Dependence and Agency Theories

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Ali Sayadi 1
Iraj Mirhossini 2
Reza Khajezadeh 1
Saman Mirabbasi 1
1 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Financial Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
10.22067/ijaaf.2026.48282.1650
Abstract
Audit risk reduction depends on the pivotal role of effective boards. However, auditors’ professional judgment is influenced by political connections, potentially impairing audit quality. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of board characteristics on audit fees. Specifically, the moderating role of political connections will be examined. This study evaluated a sample of 107 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) from 2016 to 2023. To test the research hypotheses, pooled or panel data regression models were employed. Based on the empirical results, increasing board independence and financial expertise are associated with lower audit fees. Although political connections moderated the relationship between board independence and audit fees, they had no significant effect on the relationship between board expertise and audit fees. Political connections also directly affect the relationship between board independence and audit fees by altering corporate governance mechanisms and increasing demand for high-quality independent audits. Strict audit regulations indicated a strong institutional environment, and in such an environment, the impact of political connections on auditing is likely to be reduced. Therefore, political connections cannot have a significant moderating effect on the relationship between board expertise and audit fees. This study integrated board characteristics and political connections in an emerging-market context, thereby advancing the audit literature. Practical insights are provided for regulators, auditors, and corporate governance reformers.
Keywords
Audit Fees
Board Independence
Board Financial Expertise
Political Connections
Subjects
  1. Abbott, L. J. and Parker, S. (2000). Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), pp. 47-66. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.47
  2. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S. and Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory, 23(1), pp. 69-87.‏ https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69
  3. Al Farooque, O., Buachoom, W. and Sun, L. (2020). Board, audit committee, ownership and financial performance–emerging trends from Thailand. Pacific Accounting Review, 32(1), pp. 54-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2018-0079
  4. Al-Hajaya, K. (2019). The impact of audit committee effectiveness on audit quality: Evidence from the Middle East. International Review of Management and Marketing, 9(5), pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.8341
  5. Ali, C. B. and Lesage, C. (2013). Audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: Evidence from France. China Journal of Accounting Research, 6(1), pp. 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2012.08.002
  6. Almarayeh, T. (2024). Audit committees’ independence and earnings management in developing countries: evidence from MENA countries. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-11-2023-0652
  7. Almarayeh, T. S., Aibar-Guzmán, B. and Abdullatif, M. (2020). Does audit quality influence earnings management in emerging markets? Evidence from Jordan. Revista de Contabilidad, 23(1), pp. 64-74.
  8. Ashbaugh, H. and Warfield, T. D. (2003). Audits as a corporate governance mechanism: Evidence from the German market. Journal of International Accounting Research, 2(1), pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2003.2.1.1
  9. Baker, H. K., Pandey, N., Kumar, S. and Haldar, A. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 108, pp. 232-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.025
  10. Balatbat, M. C., Taylor, S. L. and Walter, T. S. (2004). Corporate governance, insider ownership and operating performance of Australian initial public offerings. Accounting & Finance, 44(3), pp. 299-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629x.2004.00114.x
  11. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  12. Be´dard, J., Chtourou, S. M. and Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), pp. 13-35. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.13
  13. Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 71(4), pp. 443-465. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2647
  14. Ben-Amar, W., Chang, M. and McIlkenny, P. (2017). Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the carbon disclosure project. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(2), pp. 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1
  15. Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C. and Saffar, W. (2008). Political connections of newly privatized firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(5), pp. 654-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.08.003
  16. Boubakri, N., El Ghoul, S. and Saffar, W. (2013). Cash holdings of politically connected firms. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 23(4), pp. 338-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin. 2013.06.002
  17. Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D. and Saffar, W. (2012). Political connections and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(3), pp. 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.02.005
  18. Bozec, R. and Dia, M. (2017). Monitoring function of the board and audit fees: contingent upon ownership concentration. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 25(1), pp. 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2016-0054
  19. Brickley, J. A. and James, C. M. (1987). The takeover market, corporate board composition, and ownership structure: The case of banking. The Journal of Law and Economics, 30(1), pp. 161-180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/725396
  20. Buniamin, S., Alrazi, B., Johari, N. H. and Rahman, N. R. A. (2011). Corporate governance practices and environmental reporting of companies in Malaysia: Finding possibilities of double thumbs up. Jurnal Pengurusan, 32(2011), pp. 55-71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274458534
  21. Carcello, J. V. and Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going‐concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78(1), pp. 95-117. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr .2003.78.1.95
  22. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L. and Riley Jr, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), pp. 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1506/CHWK-GMQ0-MLKE-K03V
  23. Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M. and Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1-2), pp. 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.003
  24. Cheung, P. Y. and Leung, T. Y. (2024). Do political connections help or harm family firms? An audit pricing perspective. The Chinese Economy, 57(5), pp. 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475. 2024.2321706
  25. Choi, H., Karim, K. and Zhang, Y. (2024). Earnings management risk and audit pricing: Evidence from big bath accounting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 51(7-8), pp. 1789-1827. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12764
  26. Coff, R. W. (2002). Human capital, shared expertise, and the likelihood of impasse in corporate acquisitions. Journal of Management, 28(1), pp. 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800107
  27. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R. and Cannella Jr, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), pp. 371-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040727
  28. De Angelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), pp. 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
  29. De Vaus, D. A. (2002). Surveys in social research (5th ed.). London: Routledge, London, U.K. https://parsmodir.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/devaus.pdf
  30. DeFond, M. and Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of accounting and economics, 58(2-3), pp. 275-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
  31. DeFond, M. L., Hann, R. N. and Hu, X. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), pp. 153-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00166.x
  32. Dinç, I. S. (2005). Politicians and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), pp. 453-479.https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.jfineco. 2004. 06.011
  33. Durisin, B. and Puzone, F. (2009). Maturation of corporate governance research, 1993–2007: An assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), pp. 266-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00739.x
  34. Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W. and McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), pp. 2597-2635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01000.x
  35. Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), pp. 301-325. https://www.jstor.org/stable/725104
  36. Fan, J. P. and Wong, T. J. (2005). Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(1), pp. 35-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2004.00162.x
  37. Ghazalat, A. N. M., Islam, Md. A., Noor, I. B. M. and Abu Haija, A. A. (2017). Does the competency attributes of board members’ enhance the monitoring of earnings management? Evidence from a developing country. Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, 13(1-1), pp. 100-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cbv13i1c1art4
  38. Guedhami, O., Pittman, J. A. and Saffar, W. (2014). Auditor choice in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), pp. 107-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12032
  39. Gul, F. A. (2006). Auditors' response to political connections and cronyism in Malaysia. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(5), pp. 931-963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00220.x
  40. Gupta, G., Mahakud, J. and Verma, V. (2021). CEO's education and investment–cash flow sensitivity: An empirical investigation. Review of Behavioral Finance, 13(5), pp. 555-577. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-01-2020-0020
  41. Haniffa, R. M. and Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), pp. 317-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00112
  42. Hannan, M. T., and Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), pp. 929-964. https://doi.org/10.1086/226424
  43. Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R. and Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), pp. 141-191. https://doi.org/10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GX
  44. Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., and Ling, H. (2008). Evidence on the impact of internal control and corporate governance on audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 12(1), pp. 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00367.x
  45. Hoitash, R., Markelevich, A. and Barragato, C. A. (2007). Auditor fees and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(8), pp. 761-786. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710819634
  46. Jeanjean, T. and Stolowy, H. (2009). Determinants of board members' financial expertise—Empirical evidence from France. The International Journal of Accounting, 44(4), pp. 378-402.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2009.09.002
  47. Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp. 305–360.
  48. Jizi, M. and Nehme, R. (2018). Board monitoring and audit fees: the moderating role of CEO/chair dual roles. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(2), pp. 217-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-10-2016-1464
  49. Kalelkar, R. and Khan, S. (2016). CEO financial background and audit pricing. Accounting Horizons, 30(3), pp. 325-339. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51442
  50. Kalia, D., Basu, D. and Kundu, S. (2023). Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis. Asian Review of Accounting, 31(1), pp. 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121
  51. Kamarudin, K. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. and Jahan, M. A. (2022). The effect of mandatory audit firm rotation and the auditing and reporting standards on the auditor competition and audit fees relationship: Evidence from emerging markets. International Journal of Auditing, 26(3), pp. 415-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12276
  52. Khan, I., Saha, A. K., Kamal, Y. and Islam, M. S. (2025). Do ownership structure and board composition matter in firm performance? Regulatory influence in developing economy. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 22(1), pp. 263-283.‏ https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00257-0
  53. Khatib, S. F., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A. A. and Abueid, R. (2021). Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), pp. 985-1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2665
  54. Khwaja, A. I. and Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), pp. 1371-1411. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355305775097524
  55. Kosnik, R. D. (1987). Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(2), pp. 163-185. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393124
  56. Krishnan, G. V. and Visvanathan, G. (2009). Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors’ accounting expertise and the level of audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(4), pp. 1081- 1115. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.866884
  57. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), pp. 1113-1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042
  58. La Rocca, M., Fasano, F., Cappa, F. and Neha, N. (2022). The relationship between political connections and firm performance: An empirical analysis in Europe. Finance Research Letters, 49(1), A. 103157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103157
  59. Lee, W. and Wang, L. (2017). Do political connections affect stock price crash risk? Firm-level evidence from China. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 48(3), pp. 643-676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-016-0563-3
  60. Lin, Y. C. (2018). The consequences of audit committee quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(2), pp. 192-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-03-2016-1350
  61. Nguyen, B., Do, H. and Le, C. (2022). How much state ownership do hybrid firms need for better performance?. Small Business Economics, 59(3), pp. 845-871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00556-8
  62. O’sullivan, N. (2000). The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality: Evidence from large UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 32(4), pp. 397-414. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2000.0139
  63. Pabst, A. and Scazzieri, R. (2023). The Constitution of Political Economy: Polity, Society and the Commonweal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108923231
  64. Palmrose, Z. V. (1988). 1987 Competitive manuscript co-winner: an analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. Accounting Review, 63(1), pp. 55–73.
  65. Pang, C. and Wang, Y. (2021). Political connections, legal environments and firm performance around the world. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(3), pp. 4393-4409. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2021
  66. Perry, Y. K. Z., Adrian, C. and Truong, C. (2025). Politically connected audit committee and audit risk: Evidence from a quasi‐Accounting & Finance, 65(2), pp. 1428-1467. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13373
  67. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row, New York.
  68. Saggese, S., Sarto, F., Romano, R. and Viganò, R. (2023). Implications of directors’ education for audit fees: does the audit committee matter? Managerial Auditing Journal, 38(6), pp. 901-926. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2022-3544
  69. Sanan, N. K., Jaisinghani, D. and Yadav, S. (2021). Corporate governance, firm performance, and business group affiliation: evidence from India. Management Decision, 59(8), pp. 1863-1876. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2019-0376
  70. Sari, R. N. and Anugerah, R. (2011). The effect of political influence and corporate transparency on firm performance: empirical evidence from Indonesian listed companies. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 7(8), pp. 773-783. http://www.davidpublisher.org/index.php /Home/Article/ index? id= 244 1.
  71. Shahzad, F., Saeed, A., Asim, G. A., Qureshi, F., Rehman, I. U. and Qureshi, S. (2021). Political connections and firm performance: further evidence using a generalised quantile regression approach. IIMB Management Review, 33(3), pp. 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2021.08.005
  72. Simon, D. T. and Francis, J. R. (1988). The effects of auditor change on audit fees: Tests of price cutting and price recovery. Accounting Review, 63(2), pp. 255-269. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248104
  73. Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), pp. 161–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490397
  74. Uang, J. Y., Citron, D. B., Sudarsanam, S. and Taffler, R. J. (2006). Management going‐concern disclosures: Impact of corporate governance and auditor reputation. European Financial Management, 12(5), pp. 789-816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2006.00277.x
  75. Uddin, M. H. (2016). Effect of government share ownership on corporate risk taking: Case of the United Arab Emirates. Research in International Business and Finance, 36, pp. 322-339. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.09.033
  76. Weisbach, M.S. and Hermalin, B.E. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), pp. 7-26. https://doi.org/2139/ssrn.233111
  77. Xiao, F., Chan, A. L. C. and Chen, V. Y. (2023). Board political connections and tradeoff between market and nonmarket advantages: evidence from corporate financial information disclosure. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113949
  78. Young, S. (2000). The increasing use of non‐executive directors: its impact on UK board structure and governance arrangements. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27(9‐10), pp. 1311-1342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00358
  79. Zaman, M., Hudaib, M. and Haniffa, R. (2011). Corporate governance quality, audit fees and non‐audit services fees. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38(1‐2), pp. 165-197. https://doi.org/1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02224.x
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.