Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance

Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance

The Relationship Between Managerial Overconfidence and ESG: Emphasizing The Role of Environmental Costing

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Hanan Abdullah Hasan
Postgraduate Institute for Accounting and Financial Studies, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
10.22067/ijaaf.2026.48300.1675
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the relationship between managerial overconfidence and ESG, emphasizing the moderating role of environmental costing in Iraqi firms and assessing whether environmental costing moderates the relationship between managerial overconfidence and ESG reporting among Iraqi companies. A multivariate regression model was employed to test the research hypotheses. The hypotheses were tested using panel data techniques with a fixed-effects model for firms listed on the Iraq Stock Exchange (ISE) from 2014 to 2023. The results showed a strong positive link between managerial overconfidence and ESG reporting. In addition, the findings suggested that environmental costing played a moderating role in the relationship between managerial overconfidence and ESG reporting. This study is unique in that it was the first to explore the interaction among environmental cost-effectiveness, managerial overconfidence, and corporate ESG reporting among firms on the ISE. The unique characteristics of Iraq’s emerging market environment created a distinctive context for this research. This study also examines the moderating role of environmental costing in the relationship between managerial overconfidence and ESG reporting. The research provided a fresh perspective on corporate financial management, particularly under crisis conditions. The results not only illustrated useful insights for managers, analysts, and regulatory institutions in Iraq but also enriched the existing literature in this regard.
Keywords
Environmental Costing
ESG
Managerial Overconfidence
Subjects
  1. Al Amosh, H. and Khatib, S. F. (2022). Ownership structure and environmental, social, and governance performance disclosure: the moderating role of the board independence. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 2(1), pp. 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-07-2021-0094
  2. Al Amosh, H., Khatib, S. F. and Ananzeh, H. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance impact on financial performance: evidence from the Levant countries. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(3), pp. 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0105
  3. Alduais, F. (2023). Unravelling the intertwined nexus of firm performance, ESG practices, and capital cost in the Chinese business landscape. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), A. 2254589. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2254589
  4. Almeyda, R. and Darmansya, A. (2019). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure on firm financial performance. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 5(5), pp. 278-290. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6340
  5. Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R. and Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), p. 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910Al
  6. Amarna, K., Garde Sánchez, R., López‐Pérez, M. V. and Marzouk, M. (2024). The effect of environmental, social, and governance disclosure and real earnings management on the cost of financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), pp. 3181-3193. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2740
  7. Arora, A. and Sharma, D. (2022). Do environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance scores reduce the cost of debt? Evidence from Indian firms. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(5), pp. 4–18. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i5.02
  8. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, E., Brooks, R. and Do, H. X. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels. Economic Modelling, 121, A. 106203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106203
  9. Chen, S., Song, Y. and Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, A. 118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829
  10. Feng, Z. and Wu, Z. (2023). ESG disclosure, REIT debt financing and firm value. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 67(3), pp. 388-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-021-09857-x
  11. Firmansyah, E. A., Umar, U. H. and Jibril, R. S. (2023). Investigating the effect of ESG disclosure on firm performance: The case of Saudi Arabian listed firms. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), A. 2287923. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2287923
  12. Friede, G., Busch, T. and Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), pp. 210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
  13. Houqe, M. N., Ahmed, K. and Richardson, G. (2020). The effect of environmental, social, and governance performance factors on firms’ cost of debt: International evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 55(03), A. 2050014. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406020500146
  14. Li, W., Hu, H. and Hong, Z. (2024). Green finance policy, ESG rating, and cost of debt—Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 92, A. 103051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103051
  15. Linnenluecke, M. K. (2022). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the context of multinational business research. Multinational Business Review, 30(1), pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-11-2021-0148
  16. Malik, N. and Kashiramka, S. (2024). Impact of ESG disclosure on firm performance and cost of debt: Empirical evidence from India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 448, A. 141582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141582
  17. Mittal, R. K., Sinha, N. and Singh, A. (2008). An analysis of linkage between economic value added and corporate social responsibility. Management Decision, 46(9), pp. 1437-1443. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810912037
  18. Nollet, J., Filis, G. and Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, pp. 400-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.019
  19. Possebon, E. A. G., Cippiciani, F. A., Savoia, J. R. F. and De Mariz, F. (2024). ESG scores and performance in Brazilian public companies. Sustainability, 16(13), p. 5650. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135650
  20. Priem, R. and Gabellone, A. (2024). The impact of a firm’s ESG score on its cost of capital: can a high ESG score serve as a substitute for a weaker legal environment. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(3), pp. 676-703. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2023-0254
  21. Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F. and Mariani, M. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), pp. 1412-1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2134
  22. Reber, B., Gold, A. and Gold, S. (2022). ESG disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in initial public offerings. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), pp. 867-886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04847-8
  23. Rousseeuw, P. J. and Leroy, A. M. (1988). A robust scale estimator based on the shortest half. Statistica Neerlandica, 42(2), pp. 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1988.tb01224.x
  24. Schrand, C. M. and Zechman, S. L. (2012). Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), pp. 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.001
  25. Taylor, S. E. and Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), p. 193.
  26. Wallace, H. M. and Baumeister, R. F. (2002). The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), pp. 819. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.819
  27. Wang, K. T., Kartika, F., Wang, W. W. and Luo, G. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and the cost of equity: Evidence from East Asia. Emerging Markets Review, 47, A. 100801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100801
  28. Wang, Y., Han, Y., Du, Q. and Hou, D. (2023). Executive overconfidence and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance. Sustainability, 15(21), A. 15570, https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115570
  29. Yu, E. P. Y., Tanda, A., Luu, B. V. and Chai, D. H. (2021). Environmental transparency and investors' risk perception: Cross‐country evidence on multinational corporations' sustainability practices and cost of equity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), pp. 3975-4000. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2852
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.